Search

Scott Charlston

Sammamish, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
154 matches · 81W–73L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 4.0
93%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.5
4 of 10
WA · 4.5
149 of 364

Scott is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Scott has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Scott has gone from the 84th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
60%
18W–12L · 54.8% of games
8.0
60%
15W–10L · 55.9% of games
9.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history154 matches
L
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Elissa Burke
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Amy Holmes / Matthew Allenmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chutimont Blacksmith
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Gale
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Buma
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jeffrey Nomi / John Hynes
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Lorring
0.065below expectation — took 33% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
John Cunningham / Mark Pavlovic
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Coghlan
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
John Hynes / Bart Fite
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Coghlan
0.036below expectation — took 43% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Roan Blacker / Chris Hall
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Lorring
0.050below expectation — took 50% of games against 66% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Marco del Rosario / Laura Arakimixed
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mia Koida
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Jeff Chaney / Matt Haba
2025-09-21 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Lorring
0.032below expectation — took 57% of games against 67% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Tony Martin / John Hynes
2025-09-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Lorring
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.