← Search

Michael Cung

Renton, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
127 matches · 78W–49L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
12%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Renton · 3.5
5 of 13
WA · 3.5
267 of 1209

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Michael has gone from the 46th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
65%
13W–7L · 58.5% of games
3.5
71.7%
33W–13L · 56.9% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 47.4% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games
8.0
100%
4W–0L · 68.5% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history127 matches
L
JOANNE SHUTT / Gabriel Perezmixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Junker
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Terry Lundeen / Nancy Portermixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Soojin To
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Soojin To
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Dickson
+0.032better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradford Gliner
−0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Bruce Killeen / Cyrus Knowles
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyson Hawkins
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Sukhandeep Singh / Shantha Kumar Kasiliya Sekar
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Park
−0.051below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bing Li
−0.026below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Adam Sherr / Fadi Ghishan
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Brown
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Park
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Namba
−0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Kevin Kang / Andy Liang
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Gipson
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.