← Search

Nancy Porter

Renton, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 79W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Porter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Porter · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
L
2026-08-08 · BC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Camara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · BC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Lundeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-28 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Isaacson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-14 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trish MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-20 · BC-MacBrandos · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · BC-MacBrandos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
W
2026-01-24 · BC-MacBrandos · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-02 · BC-Vintage-WebberMeeks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Hasbrook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-29 · Porter · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
24W–8L · 60.6% of games
3.5
64.7%
33W–18L · 55.1% of games
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.6% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 49% of the time
#1 Singles
49%
59 matches
#2 Singles
16%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe