← Search

Joanne Hasbrook

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 78W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joanne Hasbrook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-08-02 · BC-Clemente · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hasbrook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Mac Attack · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trish MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · J Hasbrook BC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · Mac Attack · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trish MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · BC-Clemente · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terry Lundeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trish MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · J Hasbrook BC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-03 · BC-MacAngels-Angelone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Muff Heffernan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-28 · BC-MacBrandos · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-25 · J Hasbrook BC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63%
34W–20L · 56.2% of games
3.5
48.8%
20W–21L · 49.4% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 28.7% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.7% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#1 Singles
30%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer