← Search

Sue Junker

Issaquah, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 24W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sue Junker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-09 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Namba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Cung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rajive Kilambi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crista Jonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-09 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edna Kainz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-01 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Chi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · Junker · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · EDG-Forever Fierce-Ng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crista Jonson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-17 · Junker · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 61.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 43.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
16%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe