Teams

EDG-Après Tennis-To

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-09vs FC-Tennis Friends-LeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Lee / Mary Chi vs Hank Chin / Soo Chin6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Namba / Sue Junker vs Manoj Sharma / Christina Vanburen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKyuho Son / Denise Luk vs JEREMY VANBUREN / TRANG TRAN6-1, 6-3
2026-07-25vs CP-Mixed Shots Reloaded-MarquartLost 12
W#1 DoublesRajive Kilambi / Holly Ng vs Justin Marquart / Colleen Wurden7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid To / Mary Chi vs Fred Wurden / Kelly Chiang6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKyuho Son / Denise Luk vs Joe van Zyl / Katie van Zyl2-6, 4-6
2026-07-18vs BETC-HigashiLost 03
L#1 DoublesHamid Sheikhghanbari / Amy Higgins vs Jade Phan / Guy Jang2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRajive Kilambi / Holly Ng vs Amy Yamamoto / Mike Kean3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Cung / Sue Junker vs JOANNE SHUTT / Gabriel Perez3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-07-11vs BC-HancockWon 30
W#1 DoublesRajive Kilambi / Sue Junker vs Juan Vegarra / Chauntelle Johnson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Cung / Soojin To vs Terry Lundeen / Nancy Porter6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBo Shen / Noriko Kilambi vs Jason Holm / Shelley Holm6-2, 6-1
2026-07-05vs AYTC-String Theory-SiegWon 30
W#1 DoublesHamid Sheikhghanbari / Amy Higgins vs Oliver Alcantara / Blakely Tsurusaki6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRajive Kilambi / Holly Ng vs Joshua Hill / Nari Benson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBo Shen / Denise Luk vs Nguyen Ha / Kim Li Eng6-0, 6-4
2026-06-27vs TCSP-Lob & Order-TamelingLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Chi / Scott Lee vs Cat Zhang / John Stockbauer1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSoojin To / Brian Namba vs Miwa Nagai / Russel Hercules0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNoriko Kilambi / Bo Shen vs Aki Tameling / Charles Oliver6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-20vs PL-Mixed Feelings-SychLost 12
L#1 DoublesHamid Sheikhghanbari / Amy Higgins vs Tetyana Sych / Vikas Pabreja3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSoojin To / Michael Cung vs Julia Pollock / Barrett Park6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid To / Kimberly Rowland vs Renee Fletcher / Scott Fletcher7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Hamid Sheikhghanbari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Noriko Kilambi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Denise Luk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Rajive Kilambi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Holly Ng
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Sue Junker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Scott Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Mary Chi
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.34
Brian Namba
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Soojin To
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
David To
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Michael Cung
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Kimberly Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Bo Shen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Kyuho Son
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Amy Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Lee + Mary Chi8162% games+12.1% vs expected
Soojin To + David To6953% games+6.3% vs expected
Brian Namba + Soojin To044 matchesnot enough data
Brian Namba + Mary Chi134 matchesnot enough data
Rajive Kilambi + Holly Ng213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Higgins + Hamid Sheikhghanbari123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hamid Sheikhghanbari
53W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Noriko Kilambi
33W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Denise Luk
64W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Rajive Kilambi
49W–88L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Holly Ng
130W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Sue Junker
24W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Scott Lee
64W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Mary Chi
72W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Brian Namba
75W–92L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Soojin To
99W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
David To
94W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Michael Cung
78W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Kimberly Rowland
58W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3
Bo Shen
25W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Kyuho Son
36W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Amy Higgins
90W–112L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.