Search

CECI BISSONNETTE

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
130 matches · 80W–50L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
63%
stay 3.5
37%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.40. Lower than today’s 3.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
11 of 63
WA · 3.5
123 of 1209

CECI is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

CECI has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, CECI has gone from the 81st to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
27W–9L · 63.2% of games
3.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 61.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Fauser
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jason Hsu / Amy Hsumixed
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Larson
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquie Hartmann
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick LeClercq
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Gregory
0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Maile Intrachat / Lyndsey Gillis
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Corey
0.005about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Amy Allen / Angelyn Regala
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Perret
0.009about as expected — took 68% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick LeClercq
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Erik Fraker / Wendy Champagnemixed
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Schmidt-Warnecke
+0.000below expectation — took 71% of games against 85% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Corey
+0.015better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Pavlin
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.