Teams

MI-Crush It-Lee

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Janine Perret vs Toby Miller / Kristin Nierenberg6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Lisa Perry6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Hua / Susan Kim vs Darci Wyman / Miri Rogers6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Garr / Maile Intrachat vs Sally Revere / Sherri Wolson6-3, 6-4
2026-03-13vs BC-Happy Spicy-ParkSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Maile Intrachat vs Lana Dunsmore / Erin Park6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Eileen Wang3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cahoon / Shumei Lin vs Jingjing Cai / Tricie Hunter6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMeijean Walker / Chuan-Ling Yeh vs Sasha Moinzadeh / Tereza Birch6-7
2026-03-07vs AYTC-Busby 3.5WWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaile Intrachat / Lyndsey Gillis vs Laura Cooper / Christina Kim6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarlita Bang vs Noelani da Silva5-7, 4-3
W#2 DoublesUna Lee / Beth Garr vs Katie Busby / Katrina Spade6-3, 6-6
W#3 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Elizabeth Evans vs Rachel Stroble / Stacey Kryman6-0, 7-6
2026-02-28vs BAIN-MinerWon 40
W#1 DoublesSusan Kim / Lyndsey Gillis vs Erica Wiechers / Corinne Wolffe6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Corey vs Christy Carr6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristina Hua / Maile Intrachat vs Amanda Bast / Becky Hutt6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarlita Bang / Jennie Warren vs Julie Naus / Karen Rice6-0, 7-6
2026-02-27vs PSC-ChengWon 31
W#1 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Janine Perret vs Monica Boris / Irina Petriuc6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Giuliana Guilherme6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cahoon / Beth Garr vs Gabi Ifrim / Sanda Morea6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAngelisa Paladin / Elizabeth Evans vs Lingqing Wang / Nellie Jie2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-20vs NTC-Net Assets-EllisonWon 40
W#1 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Chuan-Ling Yeh vs Marybeth Alwood / Sue Thompson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Isabelle Ochsner6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Kim / Una Lee vs Wendy Ellison / Kim Scott6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShumei Lin / Meijean Walker vs Mary Dwyer / Valerie Gilbert6-3, 6-4
2026-02-07vs CP-TNT-SikkaWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Hua / Beth Garr vs Mary Jean Waite / Chandra Pandey6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMarlita Bang vs Nely Koralska2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Chuan-Ling Yeh vs Ge Wang / Helen Wang6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanica Knievel / Shumei Lin vs Hedi Carpenter / Tessa Chen6-2, 6-2
2026-01-24vs WSC-Woodinville Wonder Women-GaiWon 40
W#1 DoublesCECI BISSONNETTE / Chuan-Ling Yeh vs Tammi Walker / Lena Peter6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Corey vs Deanne Angell6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Cahoon / Angelisa Paladin vs Marla Vasilatos / Tammi Tompkins6-4, 4-5
W#3 DoublesMaile Intrachat / Una Lee vs Lauren Anderson / Cheryl Terry6-0, 6-1
2026-01-10vs MC-Spice Gals-KimWon 40
W#1 DoublesLyndsey Gillis / Susan Kim vs Ellen Acuario / Min Park6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Patty Graves6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Hua / Maile Intrachat vs Jennifer Chu / Mandeep Cherra6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennie Warren / Janine Perret vs Medilyn Barrett / Donna Kim4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Laura Walsh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Lyndsey Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Christina Hua
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
CECI BISSONNETTE
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.41
Angelisa Paladin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Maile Intrachat
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Beth Garr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Janine Perret
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Jennie Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Chuan-Ling Yeh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Una Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Katie Corey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Marlita Bang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Shumei Lin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Meijean Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Melissa Cahoon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Danica Knievel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Elizabeth Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Susan Kim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsey Gillis + Susan Kim13265% games+18.2% vs expected
CECI BISSONNETTE + Janine Perret9265% games+16.8% vs expected
Una Lee + Melissa Cahoon12363% games+11.6% vs expected
Una Lee + Maile Intrachat3361% games+10.9% vs expected
CECI BISSONNETTE + Susan Kim3256% games+10.6% vs expected
Meijean Walker + Una Lee12762% games+9.2% vs expected
Jennie Warren + Danica Knievel4163% games+8.3% vs expected
Jennie Warren + Christina Hua10357% games+8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Walsh
81W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.69
3.5
Lyndsey Gillis
31W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.54
3.5
Christina Hua
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
CECI BISSONNETTE
83W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Angelisa Paladin
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Maile Intrachat
84W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Beth Garr
48W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Janine Perret
85W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jennie Warren
30W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Chuan-Ling Yeh
41W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Una Lee
68W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Katie Corey
48W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Marlita Bang
58W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Shumei Lin
83W–86L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Meijean Walker
48W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Melissa Cahoon
44W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Danica Knievel
52W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elizabeth Evans
67W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Susan Kim
33W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.