Search

Laura Walsh

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
95 matches · 73W–22L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.63
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 37 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
5%
stay 3.5
95%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 43% stay · 57% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.51. Lower than today’s 3.63 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
1 of 110
WA · 3.5
9 of 1364

Laura is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Laura has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Laura has gone from the 29th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 77.1% of games
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.1% of games
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 68.1% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.3% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 66.9% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history95 matches
W
Jessmin Lau / Eliza Weiniger
2026-07-29 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Lindsay Terpstra
+0.038better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-1
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquie Hartmann
0.017below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Holland
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Laura Tran / Grace Zheng
2026-07-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Shan Zhu
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-2
W
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Gregory
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Shinn
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maile Intrachat
+0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Xiaoyi Ye
+0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 49% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Shan Zhu
0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Shan Zhu
+0.012better than expected — took 68% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Kaitlyn Casimo / Natalie Berger
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yifei Sun
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-05 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.003about as expected — took 42% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.