Teams

MI-Gregory

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-05vs NWW-EDG-WilsonLost 23
L#1 DoublesKitty Flaherty / Heidi Martin vs Anne Wilson / Helen Omand4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Lacie West6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Gregory / Lyndsey Gillis vs Renee Waltz / Maria Recchi7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Nancy Chan5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristine Hanover / Dorrinda Pierce vs Laurie Garay / Shelley Chapman3-6, 2-6
2026-05-29vs STC-RoddenWon 41
W#1 DoublesDorrinda Pierce / Kristine Hanover vs Christine Holm / Megan Slade4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Molly Fort6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Larson / Heidi Martin vs Dana Skotdal / Nicki Nelson6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Catherine Davidson6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanelle Stewart / Rachel Bermudez vs Kathleen Green / Tina L Garcia4-6, 1-6
2026-05-22vs AYTC-WillisWon 50
W#1 DoublesDorrinda Pierce / Kristine Hanover vs Shelley Hadaway / Annelliott Willis6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Ann Dillon7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaula Vollers / Kristen Glant vs Katherine Van Ewyk / Jennifer Meisner7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJanelle Stewart vs Pamela Lavitt6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Levesque Bishop / Lyndsey Gillis vs Sherri Wolson / Terri Smith6-1, 6-1
2026-05-08vs CP-Causin' a Racquet-LaunWon 41
L#1 DoublesLyndsey Gillis / Carol Gregory vs Michelle Neal / Anna Duff2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Judy Greenstein6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKitty Flaherty / Heidi Martin vs Sheri Bennett / Yuka Kimura7-6, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Gail Domingos5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Schmid / Paula Vollers vs Carly Oberg / Laura Laun6-0, 6-2
2026-04-24vs BC-ChoLost 23
W#1 DoublesKristine Hanover / Dorrinda Pierce vs Yunkyung Cho / Michelle Ho6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSella Subramanian vs Melissa Kaptik4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Bermudez / Janelle Stewart vs Andrea Wickham / Edna Gossage6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLaura Walsh vs Lisa Nordstrom2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarol Gregory / Jacquie Hartmann vs Shelley Holm / Tysen Gannon6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-10vs BC-ChoWon 32
L#1 DoublesJanelle Stewart / Jacquie Hartmann vs Melissa Kaptik / Lisa Fleischman5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Michelle Ho7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKitty Flaherty / Heidi Martin vs Shelley Holm / Andrea Wickham6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSella Subramanian vs Carlisle Quill6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Vollers / Karen Schmid vs Hejin Yim / Audrey Scallon6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-03vs TCSP-AndersonWon 41
W#1 DoublesJanelle Stewart / Rachel Bermudez vs Kelly Shewey / Julia Hartvigson6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Chen-Yi Chou6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Schmid / Carol Gregory vs Marla Aginian / Robin Freedman6-0, 7-6
W#2 SinglesSella Subramanian vs Melissa McMurray7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanice Levesque Bishop / Jacquie Hartmann vs Kirstin Anderson / Alyssa Campbell5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-27vs STC-RoddenWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristen Glant / Melanie Larson vs Kathleen Green / Heidi Scalzo3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKathryn Hagstrom vs Amy Cooper6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanelle Stewart / Rachel Bermudez vs Nicki Nelson / Tina L Garcia6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Gillis vs Molly Fort6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Schmid / Paula Vollers vs Diana Stroble / Catherine Davidson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Kathryn Hagstrom
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 4
4.00
Kitty Flaherty
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Janice Levesque Bishop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Dorrinda Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Kristine Hanover
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Heidi Martin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.79
Karen Schmid
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Janelle Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Paula Vollers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Carol Gregory
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Sella Subramanian
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Rachel Bermudez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Melanie Larson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jacquie Hartmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Laura Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.67
Kristen Glant
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Lyndsey Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janelle Stewart + Rachel Bermudez30666% games+14.8% vs expected
Kitty Flaherty + Paula Vollers7075% games+10.5% vs expected
Rachel Bermudez + Sella Subramanian7262% games+8.9% vs expected
Janice Levesque Bishop + Melanie Larson7356% games+8.1% vs expected
Kristine Hanover + Dorrinda Pierce511065% games+8.1% vs expected
Carol Gregory + Heidi Martin4357% games+7.4% vs expected
Carol Gregory + Kitty Flaherty6160% games+7.3% vs expected
Heidi Martin + Kitty Flaherty351458% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kathryn Hagstrom
50W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.03
4
Kitty Flaherty
140W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Janice Levesque Bishop
130W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Dorrinda Pierce
67W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Kristine Hanover
83W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Heidi Martin
84W–59L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Karen Schmid
81W–70L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Janelle Stewart
58W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Paula Vollers
45W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Carol Gregory
66W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Sella Subramanian
127W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Rachel Bermudez
70W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Melanie Larson
43W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Jacquie Hartmann
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Laura Walsh
81W–25L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Kristen Glant
27W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Lyndsey Gillis
31W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.