← Search

Karen Schmid

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 81W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Schmid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-05-08 · MI-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · MI-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · MI-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Gregory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Paula Vollers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · MI-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · MI-of the Tiger-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Glant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with PETER GOODMAN mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-11-15 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Nordale mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-02 · MI-Deucebags and Divas-Gregory · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gulliver Swenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
57.3%
47W–35L · 53.8% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova