← Search

Karen Schmid

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
151 matches · 81W–70L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
23 of 45
WA · 4.0
371 of 782

Karen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karen has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Karen has gone from the 61st to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
57.3%
47W–35L · 53.8% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
+0.048better than expected — took 86% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Hejin Yim / Audrey Scallon
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
−0.018about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Gregory
+0.013better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Paula Vollers
+0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Diana Stroble / Catherine Davidson
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Catherine Davidson / Diana Stroble
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
−0.004about as expected — took 58% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Larson
+0.006about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Vollers
+0.003better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Glant
+0.018better than expected — took 43% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Matta Nguyen / Jacob Chiangmixed
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with PETER GOODMAN
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Holly Boyd / Djelli Berishamixed
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Nordale
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 22% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-02 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gulliver Swenson
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.