Search

PETER GOODMAN

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
86 matches · 40W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.0
11 of 45
WA · 4.0
193 of 782

PETER is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

PETER has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, PETER has gone from the 59th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
24W–24L · 53.1% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.4% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
W
Girish Patwardhan / Rohan Patwardhan
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Chatalas
+0.050better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Cahoon
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Tyler Parsons / DHARAM PATULE
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Peterson
+0.034better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Ribeiro
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Matta Nguyen / Jacob Chiangmixed
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Olivia Shone
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Shera Myers / David Johnsonmixed
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Schmid
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
David Tran / Owen Mears
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Pomering
+0.081better than expected — took 92% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Bradley Hoefel / Binh Nguyen
2025-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Ribeiro
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.