Search

Tom Parrish

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
163 matches · 80W–83L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
98 of 186
WA · 4.0
452 of 782

Tom is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tom has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tom has gone from the 45th to the 26th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
53.4%
31W–27L · 51.3% of games
4.5
42.1%
16W–22L · 47.3% of games
8.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 51.1% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
51.4%
18W–17L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history163 matches
W
Adam Sherr / Dillon Orian
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Casazza
0.030below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 5-5
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Casazza
0.010below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Jay Squire / Ethan Chen
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Warden
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Carson Reed / Hans Martin Callechamps
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Tyler Gardner
0.030below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
ATUL ALATKAR / Conor Doane
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Varun Verma
0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Miller
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Benjamin Chen
0.008below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Youssef Shalaby / Joe Van Mieghem
2026-04-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
0.008about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Rahul M
+0.019better than expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
David Park / Kenneth Cho
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Casazza
0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Justin Bellone / Devin Longchamps
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jacob Mann
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Adrian Ciuca / Ionut Ruschamps
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · with Felix Schuler
0.039below expectation — took 44% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.