Search

Scott Warden

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
75 matches · 43W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.71
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
81 of 186
WA · 4.0
336 of 782

Scott is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Scott has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Scott has gone from the 77th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
65.7%
23W–12L · 60.6% of games
4.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history75 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Lim
0.119about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jay Squire / Ethan Chen
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Adam Corson / Erwin Chung
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
0.030below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Casazza
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Efrem Zimbalist / Joe Van Mieghem
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Day
+0.049better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Ramanuja Atur / Mark Gustinis
2025-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Fischer
0.049below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-01-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Fischer
0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 5-6
L
2025-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Hartvigson
+0.037better than expected — took 48% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Andreas Ohrbeck / Lakhmeet Singh Ghai
2024-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colin Turner
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-10 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.042below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maros Blaha
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.