Teams

TCSP-Hartvigson

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Stephen Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results9 ties
2025-03-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesDayna Guizzetti / Stephen Rosen vs Michael Kiskinen / Yuri Hirakawa6-4, 6-2
2025-03-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLiz Suver / Stephen Rosen vs Lee Wroe / Shelena Sanderson6-4, 6-4
2025-03-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Stephen Rosen vs Gerald Davis / Lisa Cipres6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Rosen / Stephen Rosen vs Paul Whipple / Robert Luthy6-3, 6-4
2024-11-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Young / Stephen Rosen vs Michael LaPierre / Lawrence Lebatique6-3, 6-3
2024-09-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Stephen Rosen vs Brandt Wegner / Shannon Fraser7-6, 6-0
2024-09-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesMindy Blakeslee / Stephen Rosen vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Steve Eggerts6-3, 6-4
2024-04-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAaron Miller / Stephen Rosen vs Andrew Parcel / Jeffrey Stoner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Rosen / Aswin Krishnan vs Brian Jensen / Chris Stacey6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Stephen Rosen
103W–56L career
0%87%13%
3.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.