Search

Chris Casazza

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 42W–42L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
55 of 186
WA · 4.0
228 of 782

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Chris has gone from the 63rd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.8% of games
4.5
58.5%
31W–22L · 53.9% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
9.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
Adam Sherr / Dillon Orian
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
0.030below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 5-5
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
0.010below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Daniel Brown / Mike Drakulichchamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Rob Vander Stoep
+0.018better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Janine VanderWhitte
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Schodde
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sarah Schodde
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
David Park / Kenneth Cho
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Parrish
0.042below expectation — took 33% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Warden
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
David Lam / Craig Collins
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Vana
0.022below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tyler Parsons / Vikram Srinivasan
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audley Becker
0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Jeffrey Abram / Jared Hill
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Vana
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Audley Becker
0.023below expectation — took 37% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.