← Search

Akari Fried

BRIER, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 73W–34L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Akari Fried to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-09-11 · CAC/SL-Brace Yourselves-Jungmann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Weyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · Happy Hour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-3
W
2026-07-25 · Happy Hour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kana Waldron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-12 · Happy Hour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misa Banks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-04 · Happy Hour · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mutsumi Locklear
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Weyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Vana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Racquel Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yoshimi Pelczarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-16 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yoshimi Pelczarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
69.5%
57W–25L · 58% of games
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams