← Search

Rachel Blake

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 69W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Blake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-05-29 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Kolenski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-18 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Janson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-08 · NWW-Janson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 66% of games
3.5
82.3%
51W–11L · 59% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe