← Search

Rachel Blake

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
85 matches · 66W–19L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.67
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
94 of 186
WA · 4.0
428 of 782

Rachel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rachel has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rachel has gone from the 26th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 71.2% of games
3.5
82.3%
51W–11L · 59% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
+0.004about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
−0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
+0.073better than expected — took 86% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Kolenski
+0.010better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Meyer
+0.023better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jennie Hong / Ming-Lee Yuan
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
−0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Fliflet
−0.040below expectation — took 35% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Janson
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet
+0.007better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Monica Fliflet
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Meyer
−0.010about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.