← Search

Melanie Redding

Lacey, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 112W–138L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Melanie Redding to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-09-13 · PL-Girls Play Games-Haluptzok · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rene Ketchum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-3
L
2026-08-03 · Hit happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Y-Nhi Waldo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · Hit happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-31 · Hit happens · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Mary Guptill championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Cathy Healy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Patty Kilmer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · PL-Spring Swing-Haluptzok · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-22 · PL-Spring Swing-Haluptzok · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Hillger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-08 · PL-Spring Swing-Haluptzok · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Hillger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · VAC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Huffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-01 · PL-Spring Swing-Haluptzok · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams91 teams · 2012–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
43.1%
28W–37L · 48.1% of games
4.5
20%
4W–16L · 37.5% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 56% of games
8.0
63.2%
36W–21L · 57.4% of games
9.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
54.8%
17W–14L · 49.9% of games
9.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova