← Search

Catherine Bursiek

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 129W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Bursiek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Meet Me At Midcourt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · Meet Me At Midcourt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · Meet Me At Midcourt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Meet Me At Midcourt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Kelley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-15 · Meet Me At Midcourt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Dire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Kraus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-13 · TCSP-Fletcher · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrissie Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 59.6% of games
3.5
81.2%
56W–13L · 66.2% of games
4.0
56.7%
38W–29L · 52% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
38.1%
8W–13L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
101 matches
#1 Singles
24%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova