← Search

Suzanne Kolenski

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 26W–12L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Kolenski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-08-04 · Hits Different · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-07-07 · Hits Different · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Bursiek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-02 · Hits Different · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-12 · Hits Different · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-23 · TCSP-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Welsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-05-02 · TCSP-Hits Different-Bursiek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-04-25 · TCSP-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Grundmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-05-31 · TCSP-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sunita Iyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-17 · TCSP-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Grundmeyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 65.4% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer