Search

Alyssa Grundmeyer

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2023
74 matches · 54W–20L · seasons 20192025
Where Alyssa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Alyssa is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alyssa has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Alyssa has gone from the 36th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
85%
17W–3L · 64.3% of games
3.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 58.8% of games
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Matyas
+0.013about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Kolenski
+0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2024-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Kolenski
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Jennifer Johnson / Katherine Walker
2024-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine VanderWhitte
+0.021better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine VanderWhitte
+0.014about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Katherine Walker / Jennifer Johnson
2023-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Mcnaughton
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Molly Bishop
2023-05-11 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janine VanderWhitte
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2023-04-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deven McCoy
+0.026better than expected — took 43% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2022-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Milton Smith
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Kris Porter / John Minnichmixed
2022-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zhe Yang
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.