Search

Jill Lang

Snohomish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
101 matches · 71W–30L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Snohomish · 4.0
1 of 8
WA · 4.0
233 of 782

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jill has gone from the 85th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
75.8%
69W–22L · 58.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.035below expectation — took 71% of games against 76% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Lori van Holmes / Carrie Steen
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.033better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Katherine Van Ewyk / Beth Rossi
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.002about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
+0.026better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Stark
0.026below expectation — took 40% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.015better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Laura Laun / Lorraine Wong
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.