← Search

Katherine Van Ewyk

Seattle, WA
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 3W–9L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Katherine Van Ewyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
L
2026-08-01 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · HBSQ-Vana · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · AYTC-Willis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · AYTC-Willis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Meisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · AYTC-Willis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Meisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · AYTC-Willis · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · AYTC-Willis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-27 · AYTC-Willis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-13 · AYTC (Daytime) W Squared-Willis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-06 · AYTC (Daytime) W Squared-Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Rossi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-30 · AYTC (Daytime) W Squared-Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Meisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · AYTC (Daytime) W Squared-Willis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Thornberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
20%
2W–8L · 38% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Singles
25%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#2 Singles
8%
1 match
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer