← Search

Linda Baker

Clyde Hill, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
127 matches · 80W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.58
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
16%
down to 3.5
84%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.58 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Clyde Hill · 4.0
7 of 9
WA · 4.0
599 of 782

Linda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Linda has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Linda has gone from the 67th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
69.4%
34W–15L · 53.9% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.4% of games
8.0
76%
19W–6L · 60.3% of games
9.0
50%
5W–5L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erik Gunvaldson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bhanu Purohit
+0.000about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Michiyo Killeen / Diane Mohr
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Czerwinski
−0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Frances Chapman / Suzy Skone
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Czerwinski
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Oberg
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Czerwinski
+0.066better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Kathleen Gilkey / Rose Marie Gai
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Czerwinski
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Linda Blegen / Aiko Tamiya
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Czerwinski
+0.032better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather McKay
−0.078below expectation — took 33% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Stein
−0.053below expectation — took 28% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · with Sheri Bennett
−0.069below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Oberg
−0.034below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.