← Search

Tysen Gannon

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
201 matches · 111W–90L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.5
82%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.60. Higher than today’s 3.57 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.0
26 of 33
WA · 4.0
610 of 782

Tysen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tysen has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Tysen has gone from the 16th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
80%
20W–5L · 65.3% of games
4.0
53.6%
52W–45L · 51.6% of games
4.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history201 matches
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Patchin
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Nina Menon / Ruth Sheehan
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmen Zlateff
−0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Anne Oehlerich
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.053better than expected — took 63% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Melissa Haigh
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.049better than expected — took 59% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Jackie Mee
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-05 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.066below expectation — took 33% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Rebecca Fine
2026-06-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.022better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lyna Nguyen
+0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.008better than expected — took 100% of games against 80% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Katherine Van Ewyk
2026-05-29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.039below expectation — took 72% of games against 79% expected
6-0, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.