Search

Gina Sjolander

Issaquah, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
49 matches · 24W–25L · seasons 20192026
Where Gina sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Gina is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Gina has gone from the 60th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
46.7%
14W–16L · 49% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 41.7% of games
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
L
Lori van Holmes / Carrie Steen
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Jaeger
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jennifer Meisner / Katherine Van Ewyk
2026-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gunjan Tykodi
0.014below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Kathleen Nolan
0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danxia Chen
0.067below expectation — took 33% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie MacKey
0.037below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ying-Fang Lai
+0.038better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Chan
0.021below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-02-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Nolan
+0.012better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chenoa Haluptzok
0.041below expectation — took 38% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-10-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chenoa Haluptzok
+0.019better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-10 · #2 Doubles · with Greta Dedmon
0.017below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Marina Abbott / Donna Massoth
2023-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greta Dedmon
0.010about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.