← Search

Isabelle Ochsner

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
137 matches · 63W–74L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 31% stay · 69% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
12 of 144
WA · 3.0
46 of 755

Isabelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Isabelle has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Isabelle has gone from the 89th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 71.4% of games
3.5
42.4%
39W–53L · 46.8% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history137 matches
W
Anuradha Nandagiri
2026-05-12 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Ashlie Stroble
2026-05-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.033better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Rae Wang
2026-04-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.014about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kate Gilham
2026-04-15 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.018about as expected — took 80% of games against 76% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Marisa Webb
2026-04-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.001about as expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Gegi Ward
2026-04-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.027below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
Kristin Pascal
2026-03-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.001better than expected — took 86% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Laura Walsh
2026-02-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.019better than expected — took 57% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.000about as expected — took 68% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Jessica Zhi
2026-02-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.023below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Beaudoin
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.