← Search

Marisa Webb

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
144 matches · 62W–82L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
16%
stay 3.0
84%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 61% stay · 39% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.98. Lower than today’s 3.08 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 3.0
4 of 28
WA · 3.0
130 of 960

Marisa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marisa has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Marisa has gone from the 10th to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.0
42%
37W–51L · 47.4% of games
3.5
32%
8W–17L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history144 matches
L
Julia Bai
2026-05-26 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Andrea Lee
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.052better than expected — took 48% of games against 29% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Gegi Ward
2026-05-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-5
W
Cathy Wong / Leilani Caldwell
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Hardwick
−0.009below expectation — took 47% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.033better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.030better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 4-3
W
Rachel Wang
2026-04-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Linlin Yang
2026-04-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.058below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Yuni Kwon
2026-04-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.011below expectation — took 43% of games against 48% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.