Search

Chenoa Haluptzok

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
183 matches · 92W–91L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
35%
down to 3.5
65%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 21% down · 79% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.53 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sammamish · 4.0
29 of 33
WA · 4.0
681 of 782

Chenoa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chenoa has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chenoa has gone from the 46th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
47.9%
56W–61L · 48.8% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 60% of games
8.0
45%
9W–11L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history183 matches
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Srinivas Pothineni
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Katie Stark
0.035below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter
0.017below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
+0.026better than expected — took 57% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
0.008about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Welch Coulter
0.013below expectation — took 43% of games against 51% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
0.012below expectation — took 45% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Lovingfoss / Esther Kim
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Foss
0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Blasko
0.021below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.