← Search

Andrea Wickham

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 94W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrea Wickham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
W
2026-07-30 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Bussard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · AYTC-Sidbury's Gang-Sherr · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Bussard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · The Decafs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Rodden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-29 · BC-Cho · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Gossage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · BC-Cho · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonnel Bowser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-24 · BC-Cho · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Gossage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · BC-Cho · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edna Gossage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 61.1% of games
4.0
57.1%
44W–33L · 54.3% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
12W–4L · 57.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 50.1% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams