← Search

Stephanie Kornblum

Mercer Island, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
77 matches · 29W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Kornblum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2026-08-09 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gulliver Swenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-08-07 · Serving Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hilary Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-03 · Serving Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Thunen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Serving Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Brick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-26 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gulliver Swenson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · MI-Summer Slackers-Gregory · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick LeClercq mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · MI-Holtzclaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with CECI BISSONNETTE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · MI-Holtzclaw · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Holtzclaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · MI-Holtzclaw · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Govier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · MI-Holtzclaw · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Carson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-02-27 · MI-Brick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Jacoby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-14 · MI-Brick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
41.9%
26W–36L · 45.4% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer