← Search

Haena Mullen

Redmond, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Haena Mullen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Heidi Richter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · NWW-PSC-George · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xun Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · NWW-PSC-George · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2024-08-02 · NWW-PSC-Singh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Viraj Desai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-07-21 · PSC-Chen/Kancherla · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Florin Lazar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
W
2024-07-14 · NWW-PSC-Singh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vijay Beniwal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6
W
2024-07-06 · NWW-PSC-Singh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Viraj Desai mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-06-15 · NWW-PSC-Singh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vijay Beniwal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-05-31 · PSC-Omand/Zhang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Omand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2024-05-26 · PSC-Omand/Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Sia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-03-23 · PSC-Omand/Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2023-04-28 · PSC-Tiger Palm V2-Wang/Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
64.6%
31W–17L · 53.9% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.6% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 50.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams