Search

Meghan Zech

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
47 matches · 27W–20L · seasons 20212026
Where Meghan sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Meghan is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Meghan has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Meghan has gone from the 82nd to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
67.6%
23W–11L · 55.2% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Maloney
+0.016better than expected — took 54% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Pia Westen / Mycah Gambrell
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Fonseca
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
+0.013better than expected — took 72% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2025-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
+0.015better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Sofranek / Lauren Kuan
2025-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Emily Hawkins / Alexis Gregerson
2025-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Fonseca
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Fonseca
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Blakeslee
+0.037better than expected — took 83% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 4-1
W
2024-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Helen Fonseca
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-4
L
Joanna Foss / Felicia van Pelt
2024-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Augustine
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.