Search

Helen Fonseca

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
49 matches · 26W–23L · seasons 20192025
Where Helen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Helen is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Helen has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Helen has gone from the 52nd to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
59%
23W–16L · 54.9% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history49 matches
W
N/A
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
0.043about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Zech
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Mina Park / Cindy Park
2025-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Blakeslee
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Cook
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Elisabeth Frerichs / Tina Zakahi
2025-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Maloney
0.027below expectation — took 61% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Zech
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Dickinson
0.046below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Zech
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
TRANG TRAN / Jamie Williams
2024-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Blakeslee
+0.016better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Zech
0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-4
W
N/A
2023-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Marcotte Solimano
0.037about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Robinson
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
5-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.