← Search

Leigh Perks

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 37W–42L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Leigh Perks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-09-13 · MI-Brick · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Govier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · MI-Dream Team-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wenjing Yin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · MI-Dream Team-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia King Hately
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · MI-Dream Team-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meijean Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · MI-Dream Team-Lee · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · MI-Dream Team-Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-03-07 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-28 · MI-Carson/Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · MI-Carson/Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-04 · MI-Carson/Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-10-04 · MI-Purple Reign-Perks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Levesque Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kathy Govier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.7% of games
4.0
40%
14W–21L · 45.4% of games
8.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer