← Search

Leigh Perks

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
78 matches · 37W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
81%
stay 3.5
19%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.36. Lower than today’s 3.43 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
16 of 63
WA · 3.5
209 of 1209

Leigh is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leigh has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Leigh has gone from the 48th to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.7% of games
4.0
40%
14W–21L · 45.4% of games
8.0
75%
9W–3L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wenjing Yin
+0.031better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tammy Hu / Charmaine Lam
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia King Hately
+0.060better than expected — took 92% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meijean Walker
−0.002about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Evans
−0.008about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Blakely Tsurusaki / Isabella Hashimoto
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Warren
+0.022better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-3
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
−0.066below expectation — took 35% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
−0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Christa Eadson / Katrina Miller
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
−0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Brenda Kim / Xue Song
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Chen
+0.028better than expected — took 72% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Levesque Bishop
−0.057below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Kathy Govier
−0.010about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeannie Pae
+0.033better than expected — took 43% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.