← Search

Camilla George

Redmond, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 58W–59L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Camilla George to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-13 · PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ling Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
L
2026-06-06 · NWW-PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · NWW-PSC-George · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-16 · NWW-PSC-George · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-15 · PSC-George · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · PSC-George · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-20 · PSC-George · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · PSC-George · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xun Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-25 · PSC-George · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-01-10 · PSC-George · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xun Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 54.7% of games
4.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.9% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 42.3% of games
9.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer