Teams

PSC-Baldwin

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs BC-SirottaLost 12
W#1 DoublesCamilla George / Nellie Jie vs Debbie McAllister / Jennifer Shields6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesYi Cao / Nirasha Ramchurren vs Rebecca Ryals / Nancy Burlingame2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Gabi Ifrim vs Muff Heffernan / Ann Imus2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-02vs AYTC-Edwards 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Rae Smith / Irina Petriuc vs Stella Withey / Meijean Walker2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNirasha Ramchurren / Nellie Jie vs Nancy Roma / Kimberly Dirksen3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGabi Ifrim / Luisa Brown vs Tina Zakahi / Michelle Osborn7-5, 6-4
2025-10-25vs ETC-Can't Drive 55-WyerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCamilla George / Nellie Jie vs Meta Lee / Shannon Corbett6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Gabi Ifrim vs Yvonne Klopfenstein / Eden Goldbloom7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrenda Cheng / Luisa Brown vs Valerie Berberoglu / Heather Palmer6-2, 6-2
2025-10-04vs HBSQ-VitcovichSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Ann Rae Smith vs Ellen Johnson / Kathleen Hauer1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNellie Jie / Lia Morrison vs Fran Joy / Mary Heller7-6, 6-2
2025-09-27vs CAC/SL-50 Shades of Play-PetersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCamilla George / Nellie Jie vs Dorrie Johnson / Zarlasht Toner5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Ann Rae Smith vs Susan Kushibuchi / Carolyn Smith4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLuisa Brown / Irina Petriuc vs Kim Foley / Diane Mohr2-6, 4-6
2025-09-21vs BETC-HollarLost 03
L#1 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Yi Cao vs Sheri Borden / Vicki Moll5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrenda Cheng / Nellie Jie vs Nona Allison / Mary Louise Sumioka7-6, 2-3
L#3 DoublesGabi Ifrim / Lia Morrison vs Sue Dillard / Vivian Jackson4-6, 4-6
2025-09-13vs PL-Golden Slam-HaluptzokLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Rae Smith / Lia Morrison vs Mitzi Fritz / Anne Welch Coulter1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNellie Jie / Brenda Cheng vs Renee Fletcher / Trisha Hoss2-6, 4-6
2025-09-05vs NTC-Game Set Smash-ZimbelmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMerri Baldwin / Gabi Ifrim vs Anne Diaw / Jamie Williams3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrenda Cheng / Luisa Brown vs Khue Tran / Hwayun Lee6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Camilla George
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Merri Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dolores Mirabella
published 3.5
3.14
Brenda Cheng
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Ann Rae Smith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Nirasha Ramchurren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Irina Petriuc
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Nellie Jie
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.85
Yi Cao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Gabi Ifrim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Lia Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Luisa Brown
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yi Cao + Merri Baldwin3348% games+5.7% vs expected
Luisa Brown + Irina Petriuc2445% games+4.3% vs expected
Yi Cao + Brenda Cheng3252% games+3.1% vs expected
Ann Rae Smith + Lia Morrison0832% games−6.6% vs expected
Irina Petriuc + Gabi Ifrim044 matchesnot enough data
Camilla George + Nellie Jie303 matchesnot enough data
Gabi Ifrim + Nellie Jie123 matchesnot enough data
Gabi Ifrim + Merri Baldwin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camilla George
57W–59L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Merri Baldwin
15W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Dolores Mirabella
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Cheng
58W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Ann Rae Smith
51W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.06
Nirasha Ramchurren
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Irina Petriuc
68W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Nellie Jie
41W–42L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Yi Cao
58W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Gabi Ifrim
51W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Lia Morrison
57W–82L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.60
Luisa Brown
20W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.