Search

Melissa Jones

Seattle, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
48 matches · 20W–28L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
100%
down to 3.5
0%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 94% down · 6% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.38. Higher than today’s 3.28 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
186 of 186
WA · 4.0
781 of 782

Melissa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Melissa has gone from the 7th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 56.8% of games
4.0
20%
3W–12L · 37.1% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 56.1% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 32.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Fitzgerald
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginger Knox
0.078below expectation — took 0% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Hall
0.047below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ginger Knox
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julia Clarke
+0.010about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julia Clarke
0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ginger Knox
0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julia Clarke
0.010below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Fitzgerald
0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 73% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Cheryl Hartman / Jameson Lyon
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Campbell
0.089below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Muff Heffernan
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Melissa Boucher / Beth Goodman
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Clarke
+0.056better than expected — took 86% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.