← Search

Jasmine Kreizenbeck

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
140 matches · 88W–52L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
77%
stay 3.5
23%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.37. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.5
11 of 43
WA · 3.5
190 of 1209

Jasmine is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jasmine has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jasmine has gone from the 91st to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 61.3% of games
3.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 59% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history140 matches
L
Mary Fitzgerald / Melissa Jones
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Wallach
−0.023below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Cheryl Pleas / Caroline Corr
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Wallach
+0.088better than expected — took 80% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Song
+0.031better than expected — took 72% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Wallach
+0.013about as expected — took 44% of games against 39% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Richter
−0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Merri Baldwin
+0.021better than expected — took 48% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zhe Li
+0.053better than expected — took 53% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Elaine Hoy / Eliot Tongmixed
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jiaofeng Xu
+0.000better than expected — took 58% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Gemma Gimpes / Gabriel Perez - *mixed
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jiaofeng Xu
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-08-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Ma
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jagbir Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jessica Zhi / Bangwei Mamixed
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Zhang
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.