← Search

Jared Stoneberg

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
157 matches · 89W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
136 of 256
WA · 3.5
560 of 1209

Jared is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jared has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jared has gone from the 39th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
62.2%
69W–42L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.4%
13W–15L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history157 matches
L
Stanley Barnes / Wally Euyang
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
−0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Callangan
−0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Joe Shen
2026-04-19 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Toutonghi
+0.057better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Divakaran Jeyachandran
2026-04-05 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Oscar Harding / Russell Nickerson
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Hanses
−0.030below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Andy Quach
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.019below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
+0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
David Kong / Sid Nagendran
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Henry Kiner
−0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-02-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.016better than expected — took 100% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Cobb
−0.016below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrett Fisher
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.