Search

Jeff Au-Yeung

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
219 matches · 119W–100L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
25%
stay 3.0
75%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 70% stay · 30% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
42 of 144
WA · 3.0
161 of 755

Jeff is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeff has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jeff has gone from the 33rd to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
60.4%
58W–38L · 55.6% of games
3.5
32.7%
17W–35L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
74.4%
29W–10L · 60.1% of games
7.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history219 matches
W
Paul Bifford / Andrew Sanders
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rizwan Ahmed
0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Eysen Shi
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.034below expectation — took 62% of games against 70% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Bo Zhang / David Zhao
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arohan Ajit
+0.027better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
6-7, 5-3
L
Xudong Li / Ke Wang
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ross Bunker
0.008about as expected — took 39% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-2
L
Troy Schell / Dan Kalish
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kelly
0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Vijay Dasari / Ticson MacH
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Lam
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Dennis Perez / Dinesh Mandalapu
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Kelly
+0.008better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Joel Nethery / David Luu-Van
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lik Wong
0.036below expectation — took 32% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabe Licka
0.057below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jeffrey Ng / Charles Yuen
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Hardie
+0.009about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Connor Sommerville / Brian Hall
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Hardie
+0.020better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Zhe Yang / Harry Dongchamps
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Kelly
+0.002about as expected — took 65% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.