Search

Paul Bifford

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
207 matches · 90W–117L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
120 of 144
WA · 3.0
588 of 755

Paul is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Paul has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Paul has gone from the 1st to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
34.4%
32W–61L · 42.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
55%
11W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
59.7%
37W–25L · 54.6% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history207 matches
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Felix Acuna / Michael Gonzalez
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
+0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Susan Lusty / Mark Lewinmixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Buck
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Andy Wang / Randy He
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
0.063below expectation — took 14% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Justin Fu / Joel Nethery
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
0.003below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Rizwan Ahmed / Jeff Au-Yeung
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
+0.032better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Colin Williams / Mardella Brekke-Hutchingsmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathleen Summers
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Eric Lam / David Sandwith
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
+0.019better than expected — took 41% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
William Miao / Juan Ricardo
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Sanders
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.