← Search

Shelley Hagstrom

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 37W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shelley Hagstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with William Kennelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Kennelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Kennelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Kennelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Kennelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · HBSQ-Team #1-A Jamison-Huff · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Kennelly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-13 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristen Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cathy Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-27 · ETC-Landry/Navarro · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darla Schlumberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · ETC-Landry/Navarro · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Landry-Navarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
57.9%
22W–16L · 53.1% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games
6.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert