← Search

Sharon Farrell

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 19W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sharon Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-25 · CP-Chapman · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Valentine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · CP-Chapman · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Doug Chapman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · CP-Borgen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-12 · CP-Borgen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lindsay Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-05-21 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nan Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-01 · CP-Borgen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Bouton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-04-16 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-10-05 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-09-08 · CP-Czerwinski 7.0 Women’s 55+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-10 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-02 · CP-Borgen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary van Zyl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
32%
8W–17L · 43.4% of games
7.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal