← Search

Phyllis Gill

Airway Heights, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
58 matches · 22W–36L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Phyllis sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Phyllis is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Phyllis has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Phyllis has gone from the 50th to the 2nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.7% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 40.6% of games
7.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
L
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Evatt
−0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Escobido
−0.038below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Escobido
+0.017better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 5-3
L
Brendalen Hutchinson / Nozomi Park
2025-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qi Geng
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Rochford
+0.051better than expected — took 47% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jolene Rhodes / Amy Yamamoto
2025-02-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francisca Lehr
−0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Higgins
+0.003about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qi Geng
−0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Lowes
−0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dorothy Lowes
+0.016better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Kevyn Hauser / Kara Palmer
2024-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Smith
−0.014below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Matt Busch / Karen Bellmixed
2024-08-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ananth Narayan
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.