Search

Qi Geng

Newcastle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
132 matches · 63W–69L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Newcastle · 3.5
6 of 11
WA · 3.5
693 of 1209

Qi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Qi has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Qi has gone from the 64th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 61.1% of games
3.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 46% of games
6.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
40.4%
21W–31L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
Liza Minasyan / Minas Ter-Galstyanmixed
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bing Li
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/Amixed
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bing Li
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Carla Johnson / Irma Sikma
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Millie Chua
+0.007about as expected — took 46% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Rina Adams / Yuni Kwon
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Rochford
+0.008better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Gwendolyn Emminger / Erika Walther
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Rochford
0.010below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mihaela Olariu Ureche
+0.058better than expected — took 57% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Susan Salvadalena / Spencer Dillardmixed
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Xianglong Huang
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Mary Battison / Celia Evans
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rochford
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Laura Borner / Gaurav Kanademixed
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chun-Liang Lin
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Young
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Millie Chua
0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 5-1
W
Elena Ivanova / Kate Kennedy
2025-10-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Rochford
+0.008about as expected — took 58% of games against 54% expected
7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.