← Search

Susan Salvadalena

SEATTLE, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 126W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Salvadalena to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
L
2026-07-24 · TCSP-Lob & Order-Tameling · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russel Hercules mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Double or Muffin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevyn Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · Double or Muffin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikhaila Reudink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
W
2026-07-09 · Double or Muffin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikhaila Reudink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Double or Muffin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · TCSP-Lob & Order-Tameling · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Ng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-12 · Happy Feet · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-10 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miwa Nagai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
70.8%
75W–31L · 58.5% of games
3.5
54.9%
28W–23L · 53.3% of games
6.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.9% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#1 Singles
27%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams