← Search

Mei Yang

Everett, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 173W–117L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mei Yang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history290 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Team Me! · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Allen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Team Me! · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-4
W
2026-07-19 · CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with arvind Mallikarjunan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · MAMAS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Coley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with arvind Mallikarjunan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · MAMAS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Iffrig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-06 · MAMAS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Iffrig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Luis Enriquez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · MAMAS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Coley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · MAMAS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Iffrig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · Team Me! · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
77.6%
38W–11L · 60% of games
3.5
61.6%
69W–43L · 56% of games
4.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
15W–20L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
63.8%
30W–17L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
118 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
28 matches
#2 Singles
3%
10 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert