← Search

Joseph Lampitt

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 32W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joseph Lampitt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-08-01 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Lampitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Lampitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-07 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Merkelbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Merkelbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-13 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · TCSP-Cornwall · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Randall Cornwall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-10 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Braseth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-03 · TCSP-Cornwall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-09 · TCSP-James · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-26 · TCSP-James · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
37.9%
22W–36L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova